Be the truth

If you speak about what is not in your experience;

if you advise others about what is not visible in the list of your accomplishments;

if you create a product/content/video/audio/writeup which you can’t use/consume/see/listen/read yourself even if you belong to your definition of your target audience;

then you are on your path to an assured journey to a living hell.

For you. For your work. For your surroundings.

Giving or receiving ‘Gyan’ is of little value. It is like doing the job of a postman: someone wrote to someone else, you are just delivering!

Ok, it was oversimplified but the point is clear. Practice candor instead.

Be the truth you want the world to have. Don’t just give or accept it.

Of course, you can, but that is likely to lead you to where you don’t want to go in your life, do you?

Further notes:

  1. The origins of “candor” shine through in its first definition: “Candor” traces back to the Latin verb candēre (“to shine or glow”), which in turn derives from the same ancient root that gave the Welsh language can, meaning “white,” and the Sanskrit language “candati,” which translates to “it shines.”
  2. Other descendants of “candēre” in English include “candid,” “incandescent,” “candle,” and the somewhat less common “candent” and “candescent” (both of which are synonyms of “incandescent” in the sense of “glowing from or as if from great heat”).
  3. Candor is related to the adjective “candid” which refers to straightforward honesty or frankness in speech or expression. (I got to know about ‘Candor’ in the year 2007 while reading the 4Es of Leadership from Jack Welch but I did not understand much about it.
  4. Some of the synonyms to Candor are bluntness, candidness, directness, frankness, unguardedness and plainspokenness. (Useful for understanding what this post is about!)

Software Services Vs. Software Product

A few days ago in a tech community, I participated in an interesting discussion about making India a software product nation.

India as a Software Product Nation

One of the main discussion points was if it is possible to change the Indian Software Services industry to the Software Product Industry!

Having worked in both the Industries, I have a specific observation about how things work. Below is the glimpse of what I shared:

Many founders/owners of Software Services companies, especially the smaller companies, think that they must change the business model to a Product software company from their services company.

Not necessary. In many cases, it is counter-effective because the Software Service biz mindset is different (finishing things fast) from what usually gives success in Software Product biz (making things relevant to the market demands).

Services and Product biz – both are different ballgames, and both the business activities solve a different problem.

Typically, software service companies offer expertise to carry out certain activities such as programming, designing, analysis, testing, etc.

If the activities are performed as per the client expectations (scope, met, or exceeded), they have done a successful job, and they will get their profits.

Whereas a product software company works to solve a typical business problem (or entertainment problem if the niche is gaming/lifestyle), with whatever they have pre-produced and works to find a profitable niche where they can supply their product.

Tailor Vs. Suit maker

If you are running a software service company, you are like a Tailor who stitches the outfits to suit the needs of the clients. Still, if you are running a software product company, then you are a Suit maker company that sells the costumes to the customers who need them!

Tailor company needs tailors, and Suit maker company also needs tailors (tailor = tech professional) – but they work to achieve a different goal.

The Tailor wants to finish the work as soon as possible because they can take the next order. So a tailor’s focus is on finishing the job fast with accurate measurements!

The Suit maker wants to make the suit better/relevant, so it can attract the wider audience and with minimal alteration. They work to cater to major generic measurements because they don’t have any specific measure to chase!

Similarly, a Service biz owner wants to sell the man-hours and focuses to finish the work fast as per the scope.

It is a success for him where a Product biz owner wants to make the product better (read: relevant to the market demands). Profitably achieving product-market fit is a success for him.

While the Service biz owner has his skin in the game. because he won’t get paid if he does not provide expected Service, the Product biz owner has not only his skin but his blood beneath his skin in the game!

If he is not able to achieve the product-market fit by the time his funds last, he is out of business!

There is no “need” to move from services to product although it is a personal choice and if one understands the distinction between the two and wants to shift from Tailor mindset to Suitmaker mindset, they can!

The Ecosystem Question

Now the ecosystem question and if an ecosystem can help software product companies or not – typically, an ecosystem can help service companies more because they can exchange tailors, offer discounted rates and all.

Now, an ecosystem is less likely to help the product companies because each product company can be unique with its unique set of challenges (product-market fit) although there might be specific exceptions!

PS: these are simple thoughts, but businesses are not so simple…so, take my thoughts with a pinch of salt. Your unique context may be different! I have done both – products and services and blend of them, including investment from service biz to some products, and I was fortunate enough to make them profitable! But yes, product biz returned better profits after a significant wait period.